BackRolls-Royce Holdings plc Overview

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc Intangible Assets

Track Rolls-Royce Holdings plc's intangible assets ($650M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Intangible Assets
$649.00M
↓ 81.35% YoYΔ $-2.83B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc Intangible Assets History

Loading

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc vs. peers: Intangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc Intangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RLLCF) FAQ

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RLLCF) currently reports a intangible assets of $650M as of June 2026. That compares with $3.5B in the prior-year period — down 81.3% year over year. Use the charts on this page to explore Rolls-Royce Holdings plc's intangible assets history and peer comparisons.

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc's intangible assets decreased from $3.5B to $650M — a 81.3% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Watching multi-year history on the chart below helps separate one-off swings from a lasting trend.

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported $650M in intangible assets as of June 2026. That compares with $3.5B in the prior-year period — down 81.3% year over year. Absolute dollar amounts are most useful when compared with prior periods, peers, and related line items such as revenue, assets, or liabilities on Stockcircle.

Start with the current intangible assets of $650M, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Rolls-Royce Holdings plc, and consider following RLLCF for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc is classified in the Industrials sector. On intangible assets, it currently shows $650M. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Industrials are usually more informative than comparing RLLCF with unrelated industries.