BackRELIEF THERAPEUTICS HOLDING ORD SHS Overview

RELIEF THERAPEUTICS HOLDING ORD SHS Current Cash

Latest current cash for RLFTF: $6.6M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Current Cash
$6.62M
↓ 47.06% YoYΔ $-5.88M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

RELIEF THERAPEUTICS HOLDING ORD SHS Current Cash History

Loading

RELIEF THERAPEUTICS HOLDING ORD SHS vs. peers: Current Cash Comparison

Loading

RELIEF THERAPEUTICS HOLDING ORD SHS Cash Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

RELIEF THERAPEUTICS HOLDING ORD SHS (RLFTF) FAQ

RELIEF THERAPEUTICS HOLDING ORD SHS posts a current cash of $6.6M as of June 2026. That compares with $13M in the prior-year period — down 47.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, RELIEF THERAPEUTICS HOLDING ORD SHS's current cash was $13M. The latest reading is $6.6M — a 47.1% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Current Cash is one piece of RELIEF THERAPEUTICS HOLDING ORD SHS's financial statement story. At $6.6M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for RLFTF's current cash usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; RELIEF THERAPEUTICS HOLDING ORD SHS's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging RELIEF THERAPEUTICS HOLDING ORD SHS against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in current cash easier to interpret. Start with $6.6M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.