BackRCI Hospitality Holdings Overview

RCI Hospitality Holdings Accounts Payable

Track RCI Hospitality Holdings's accounts payable ($6.5M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Accounts Payable
$6.46M
19.44% YoYΔ $1.05M vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

RCI Hospitality Holdings Accounts Payable History

Loading

RCI Hospitality Holdings vs. peers: Accounts Payable Comparison

Loading

RCI Hospitality Holdings Accounts Payable Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

RCI Hospitality Holdings (RICK) FAQ

RCI Hospitality Holdings posts a accounts payable of $6.5M as of June 2026. That compares with $5.4M in the prior-year period — up 19.4% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, RCI Hospitality Holdings's accounts payable was $5.4M. The latest reading is $6.5M — a 19.4% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Accounts Payable is one piece of RCI Hospitality Holdings's financial statement story. At $6.5M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for RICK's accounts payable usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; RCI Hospitality Holdings's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging RCI Hospitality Holdings against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in accounts payable easier to interpret. Start with $6.5M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.