BackRH Overview

RH Receivables

Track RH's receivables ($72M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$72.44M
↓ 36.75% YoYΔ $-42.09M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

RH Receivables History

Loading

RH vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

RH Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Balance Sheet Breakdown

Current CashShort Term InvestmentsReceivablesInventoryOther Current AssetsCurrent AssetsLong Term InvestmentsProperty Plant EquipmentGoodwillIntangible AssetsOther AssetsTotal AssetsNet Tangible AssetsAccounts PayableOther Current LiabilitiesTotal Current LiabilitiesLong Term DebtOther LiabilitiesMinority InterestTotal Liabilities

RH (RH) FAQ

RH posts a receivables of $72M as of May 2026. That compares with $110M in the prior-year period — down 36.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, RH's receivables was $110M. The latest reading is $72M — a 36.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending May 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of RH's financial statement story. At $72M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for RH's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; RH's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging RH against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $72M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.