BackRegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals Overview

RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals Net Tangible Assets

RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals's net tangible assets is $0.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$0.00
100.00% YoYΔ $3.14M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals (RGRX) FAQ

RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals posts a net tangible assets of $0 as of September 2023. That compares with $-3.1M in the prior-year period — up 100.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals's net tangible assets was $-3.1M. The latest reading is $0 — a 100.0% year-over-year increase (period ending September 2023). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals's financial statement story. At $0, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for RGRX's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $0 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.