BackResources Connection Overview

Resources Connection Other Current Liabilities

Track Resources Connection's other current liabilities ($63M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$62.89M
16.60% YoYΔ $-12.51M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Resources Connection Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Resources Connection vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Resources Connection Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Resources Connection (RGP) FAQ

Resources Connection posts a other current liabilities of $63M as of May 2026. That compares with $75M in the prior-year period — down 16.6% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Resources Connection's other current liabilities was $75M. The latest reading is $63M — a 16.6% year-over-year decrease (period ending May 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Resources Connection's financial statement story. At $63M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for RGP's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Resources Connection's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Resources Connection against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $63M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.