BackCloopen Group Holding Limited Overview

Cloopen Group Holding Limited Total Liabilities

Latest total liabilities for RAASY: $470M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$471.35M
↑ 1.68% YoYΔ $7.78M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Cloopen Group Holding Limited Total Liabilities History

Loading

Cloopen Group Holding Limited vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Cloopen Group Holding Limited Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Cloopen Group Holding Limited (RAASY) FAQ

Cloopen Group Holding Limited posts a total liabilities of $470M as of September 2021. That compares with $460M in the prior-year period — up 1.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Cloopen Group Holding Limited's total liabilities was $460M. The latest reading is $470M — a 1.7% year-over-year increase (period ending September 2021). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of Cloopen Group Holding Limited's financial statement story. At $470M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for RAASY's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Cloopen Group Holding Limited's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Cloopen Group Holding Limited against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $470M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.