BackRestaurant Brands International Overview

Restaurant Brands International Long Term Debt

Restaurant Brands International's long-term debt is $4.1B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Long Term Debt
$4.08B
73.70% YoYΔ $-11.45B vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Restaurant Brands International Long Term Debt History

Loading

Restaurant Brands International vs. peers: Long Term Debt Comparison

Loading

Restaurant Brands International Long Term Debt Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) FAQ

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) currently reports a long-term debt of $4.1B as of March 2026. That compares with $16B in the prior-year period — down 73.7% year over year. Use the charts on this page to explore Restaurant Brands International's long-term debt history and peer comparisons.

Restaurant Brands International's long-term debt decreased from $16B to $4.1B — a 73.7% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Watching multi-year history on the chart below helps separate one-off swings from a lasting trend.

Restaurant Brands International reported $4.1B in long-term debt as of March 2026. That compares with $16B in the prior-year period — down 73.7% year over year. Absolute dollar amounts are most useful when compared with prior periods, peers, and related line items such as revenue, assets, or liabilities on Stockcircle.

Start with the current long-term debt of $4.1B, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Restaurant Brands International, and consider following QSR for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Restaurant Brands International is classified in the Consumer Staples sector. On long-term debt, it currently shows $4.1B. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Consumer Staples are usually more informative than comparing QSR with unrelated industries.