BackSimplify Exchange Traded Funds - Simplify Nasdaq 100 PLUS Downside Convexity ETF Overview

Simplify Exchange Traded Funds - Simplify Nasdaq 100 PLUS Downside Convexity ETF Receivables

Latest receivables for QQD: $160M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$156.00M

Peer average

Loading

Simplify Exchange Traded Funds - Simplify Nasdaq 100 PLUS Downside Convexity ETF Receivables History

Loading

Simplify Exchange Traded Funds - Simplify Nasdaq 100 PLUS Downside Convexity ETF vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Simplify Exchange Traded Funds - Simplify Nasdaq 100 PLUS Downside Convexity ETF Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Balance Sheet Breakdown

Current CashShort Term InvestmentsReceivablesInventoryOther Current AssetsCurrent AssetsLong Term InvestmentsProperty Plant EquipmentGoodwillIntangible AssetsOther AssetsTotal AssetsNet Tangible AssetsAccounts PayableOther Current LiabilitiesTotal Current LiabilitiesLong Term DebtOther LiabilitiesMinority InterestTotal Liabilities

Simplify Exchange Traded Funds - Simplify Nasdaq 100 PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (QQD) FAQ

Simplify Exchange Traded Funds - Simplify Nasdaq 100 PLUS Downside Convexity ETF's receivables stands at $160M as of September 2025. Stockcircle updates this page with the newest filings so you can track how the metric evolves quarter by quarter.

Open the history chart to see whether Simplify Exchange Traded Funds - Simplify Nasdaq 100 PLUS Downside Convexity ETF's receivables is expanding or contracting. Sustained growth in receivables can support a stronger franchise, while sharp declines may reflect divestitures, weaker demand, or accounting changes. Always read YoY moves with the footnotes of recent filings in mind.

The history chart shows how Simplify Exchange Traded Funds - Simplify Nasdaq 100 PLUS Downside Convexity ETF's receivables evolved across reporting periods, while the comparison chart places QQD next to similar companies. Use both: a rising metric that still lags peers tells a different story than a rising metric that already leads the group. Growth charts, when available, highlight acceleration or slowdown.