BackPerella Weinberg Partners - Warrants (23/06/2026) Overview

Perella Weinberg Partners - Warrants (23/06/2026) Receivables

Track Perella Weinberg Partners - Warrants (23/06/2026)'s receivables ($36M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$36.23M
↓ 25.07% YoYΔ $-12.13M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Perella Weinberg Partners - Warrants (23/06/2026) Receivables History

Loading

Perella Weinberg Partners - Warrants (23/06/2026) vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Perella Weinberg Partners - Warrants (23/06/2026) Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Perella Weinberg Partners - Warrants (23/06/2026) (PWPPW) FAQ

Perella Weinberg Partners - Warrants (23/06/2026) posts a receivables of $36M as of June 2026. That compares with $48M in the prior-year period — down 25.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Perella Weinberg Partners - Warrants (23/06/2026)'s receivables was $48M. The latest reading is $36M — a 25.1% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Perella Weinberg Partners - Warrants (23/06/2026)'s financial statement story. At $36M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for PWPPW's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Perella Weinberg Partners - Warrants (23/06/2026)'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Perella Weinberg Partners - Warrants (23/06/2026) against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $36M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.