BackPT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk Overview

PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk Total Liabilities

Latest total liabilities for PTJSY: $97T.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$97078.43B
15.62% YoYΔ $13113.36B vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk Total Liabilities History

Loading

PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk (PTJSY) FAQ

PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk posts a total liabilities of $97T as of March 2026. That compares with $84T in the prior-year period — up 15.6% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk's total liabilities was $84T. The latest reading is $97T — a 15.6% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk's financial statement story. At $97T, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for PTJSY's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $97T here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.