BackPricesmart Overview

Pricesmart Receivables

Pricesmart's receivables is $20M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$19.84M
↓ 6.65% YoYΔ $-1.41M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Pricesmart Receivables History

Loading

Pricesmart vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Pricesmart Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Balance Sheet Breakdown

Current CashShort Term InvestmentsReceivablesInventoryOther Current AssetsCurrent AssetsLong Term InvestmentsProperty Plant EquipmentGoodwillIntangible AssetsOther AssetsTotal AssetsNet Tangible AssetsAccounts PayableOther Current LiabilitiesTotal Current LiabilitiesLong Term DebtOther LiabilitiesMinority InterestTotal Liabilities

Pricesmart (PSMT) FAQ

As of the most recent data (May 2026), PSMT shows a receivables of $20M. That compares with $21M in the prior-year period — down 6.6% year over year. Scroll down for historical charts and peer comparison views.

Compared with the year-ago period, PSMT's receivables is now $20M (was $21M) — a 6.6% year-over-year decrease. Pairing that YoY change with peer averages gives a clearer picture of whether Pricesmart is outperforming or lagging.

Tracking PSMT's receivables over time shows whether Pricesmart is scaling, shrinking, or reshaping that part of the business. The current reading is $20M That compares with $21M in the prior-year period — down 6.6% year over year. Multi-quarter patterns matter more than any single print, which is why this page emphasizes history and peer comparison charts.

Besides this receivables page, Stockcircle has Pricesmart's full stock overview, other financial metrics, insider and congress trade tabs, and tools to follow the stock. Together they help you connect receivables (currently $20M) with ownership activity and broader fundamentals.

Pricesmart's receivables is $20M; compare it with other Consumer Discretionary names on the peer chart. Typical ranges vary by sub-industry, so always sanity-check against the closest competitors, not just the whole sector bucket.