BackProperty Solutions Acquisition Overview

Property Solutions Acquisition Net Tangible Assets

Latest net tangible assets for PSAC: $1.4M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$1.41M
97.64% YoYΔ $-58.44M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Property Solutions Acquisition Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Property Solutions Acquisition vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Property Solutions Acquisition Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Property Solutions Acquisition (PSAC) FAQ

Property Solutions Acquisition posts a net tangible assets of $1.4M as of June 2026. That compares with $60M in the prior-year period — down 97.6% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Property Solutions Acquisition's net tangible assets was $60M. The latest reading is $1.4M — a 97.6% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Property Solutions Acquisition's financial statement story. At $1.4M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for PSAC's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Property Solutions Acquisition's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Property Solutions Acquisition against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $1.4M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.