BackCarParts.com Overview

CarParts.com Net Tangible Assets

Track CarParts.com's net tangible assets ($60M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$59.61M

Peer average

Loading

CarParts.com Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

CarParts.com vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

CarParts.com Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Balance Sheet Breakdown

Current CashShort Term InvestmentsReceivablesInventoryOther Current AssetsCurrent AssetsLong Term InvestmentsProperty Plant EquipmentGoodwillIntangible AssetsOther AssetsTotal AssetsNet Tangible AssetsAccounts PayableOther Current LiabilitiesTotal Current LiabilitiesLong Term DebtOther LiabilitiesMinority InterestTotal Liabilities

CarParts.com (PRTS) FAQ

CarParts.com (PRTS) currently reports a net tangible assets of $60M as of April 2026. In the prior-year period, the figure was $0. Use the charts on this page to explore CarParts.com's net tangible assets history and peer comparisons.

CarParts.com's net tangible assets changed from $0 to $60M (period ending April 2026). Watching multi-year history on the chart below helps separate one-off swings from a lasting trend.

CarParts.com reported $60M in net tangible assets as of April 2026. In the prior-year period, the figure was $0. Absolute dollar amounts are most useful when compared with prior periods, peers, and related line items such as revenue, assets, or liabilities on Stockcircle.

Start with the current net tangible assets of $60M, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for CarParts.com, and consider following PRTS for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

CarParts.com is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. On net tangible assets, it currently shows $60M. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Consumer Discretionary are usually more informative than comparing PRTS with unrelated industries.