BackPerpetua Resources Overview

Perpetua Resources Receivables

Track Perpetua Resources's receivables ($3.3M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$3.27M

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Perpetua Resources Receivables History

Loading

Perpetua Resources vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Perpetua Resources Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Balance Sheet Breakdown

Current CashShort Term InvestmentsReceivablesInventoryOther Current AssetsCurrent AssetsLong Term InvestmentsProperty Plant EquipmentGoodwillIntangible AssetsOther AssetsTotal AssetsNet Tangible AssetsAccounts PayableOther Current LiabilitiesTotal Current LiabilitiesLong Term DebtOther LiabilitiesMinority InterestTotal Liabilities

Perpetua Resources (PPTA) FAQ

Perpetua Resources (PPTA) currently reports a receivables of $3.3M as of June 2026. In the prior-year period, the figure was $0. Use the charts on this page to explore Perpetua Resources's receivables history and peer comparisons.

Perpetua Resources's receivables changed from $0 to $3.3M (period ending June 2026). Watching multi-year history on the chart below helps separate one-off swings from a lasting trend.

Perpetua Resources reported $3.3M in receivables as of June 2026. In the prior-year period, the figure was $0. Absolute dollar amounts are most useful when compared with prior periods, peers, and related line items such as revenue, assets, or liabilities on Stockcircle.

Start with the current receivables of $3.3M, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Perpetua Resources, and consider following PPTA for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Perpetua Resources is classified in the Materials sector. On receivables, it currently shows $3.3M. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Materials are usually more informative than comparing PPTA with unrelated industries.