BackPOINT Biopharma Global Overview

POINT Biopharma Global Other Current Liabilities

Latest other current liabilities for PNT: $15M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$15.27M
13.85% YoYΔ $1.86M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

POINT Biopharma Global Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

POINT Biopharma Global vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

POINT Biopharma Global Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

POINT Biopharma Global (PNT) FAQ

POINT Biopharma Global posts a other current liabilities of $15M as of September 2023. That compares with $13M in the prior-year period — up 13.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, POINT Biopharma Global's other current liabilities was $13M. The latest reading is $15M — a 13.8% year-over-year increase (period ending September 2023). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of POINT Biopharma Global's financial statement story. At $15M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for PNT's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; POINT Biopharma Global's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging POINT Biopharma Global against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $15M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.