BackPennantPark Investment 5.5 % Notes 2019-15.10.24 Overview

PennantPark Investment 5.5 % Notes 2019-15.10.24 Total Assets

Track PennantPark Investment 5.5 % Notes 2019-15.10.24's total assets ($1.3B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Assets
$1.26B
0.80% YoYΔ $10.08M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

PennantPark Investment 5.5 % Notes 2019-15.10.24 Total Assets History

Loading

PennantPark Investment 5.5 % Notes 2019-15.10.24 vs. peers: Total Assets Comparison

Loading

PennantPark Investment 5.5 % Notes 2019-15.10.24 Total Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

PennantPark Investment 5.5 % Notes 2019-15.10.24 (PNNTG) FAQ

PennantPark Investment 5.5 % Notes 2019-15.10.24 posts a total assets of $1.3B as of June 2026. That compares with $1.3B in the prior-year period — up 0.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, PennantPark Investment 5.5 % Notes 2019-15.10.24's total assets was $1.3B. The latest reading is $1.3B — a 0.8% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Assets is one piece of PennantPark Investment 5.5 % Notes 2019-15.10.24's financial statement story. At $1.3B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for PNNTG's total assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; PennantPark Investment 5.5 % Notes 2019-15.10.24's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging PennantPark Investment 5.5 % Notes 2019-15.10.24 against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in total assets easier to interpret. Start with $1.3B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.