BackChildrens Place Overview

Childrens Place Total Current Liabilities

Track Childrens Place's total current liabilities ($450M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$452.38M
16.78% YoYΔ $-91.23M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Childrens Place Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Childrens Place vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Childrens Place Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Childrens Place (PLCE) FAQ

Childrens Place posts a total current liabilities of $450M as of May 2026. That compares with $540M in the prior-year period — down 16.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Childrens Place's total current liabilities was $540M. The latest reading is $450M — a 16.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending May 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Childrens Place's financial statement story. At $450M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for PLCE's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Childrens Place's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Childrens Place against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $450M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.