BackPark Hotels & Resorts Overview

Park Hotels & Resorts Total Current Liabilities

Track Park Hotels & Resorts's total current liabilities ($210M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$207.00M
6.76% YoYΔ $-15.00M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Park Hotels & Resorts Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Park Hotels & Resorts vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Park Hotels & Resorts Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) FAQ

Park Hotels & Resorts posts a total current liabilities of $210M as of March 2026. That compares with $220M in the prior-year period — down 6.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Park Hotels & Resorts's total current liabilities was $220M. The latest reading is $210M — a 6.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Park Hotels & Resorts's financial statement story. At $210M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for PK's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Park Hotels & Resorts's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Park Hotels & Resorts against Consumer Staples peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Staples are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $210M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.