BackPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Overview

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Net Tangible Assets

Latest net tangible assets for PFLT: $1B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$1.02B
6.43% YoYΔ $-69.88M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT) FAQ

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT) currently reports a net tangible assets of $1B as of June 2026. That compares with $1.1B in the prior-year period — down 6.4% year over year. Use the charts on this page to explore PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net tangible assets history and peer comparisons.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net tangible assets decreased from $1.1B to $1B — a 6.4% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Watching multi-year history on the chart below helps separate one-off swings from a lasting trend.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital reported $1B in net tangible assets as of June 2026. That compares with $1.1B in the prior-year period — down 6.4% year over year. Absolute dollar amounts are most useful when compared with prior periods, peers, and related line items such as revenue, assets, or liabilities on Stockcircle.

Start with the current net tangible assets of $1B, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, and consider following PFLT for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is classified in the Finance sector. On net tangible assets, it currently shows $1B. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Finance are usually more informative than comparing PFLT with unrelated industries.