BackPIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund Overview

PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund Accounts Payable

Track PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund's accounts payable ($160M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Accounts Payable
$163.23M
73.88% YoYΔ $-461.59M vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund Accounts Payable History

Loading

PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund vs. peers: Accounts Payable Comparison

Loading

PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund Accounts Payable Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX) FAQ

PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund posts a accounts payable of $160M as of December 2025. That compares with $620M in the prior-year period — down 73.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund's accounts payable was $620M. The latest reading is $160M — a 73.9% year-over-year decrease (period ending December 2025). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Accounts Payable is one piece of PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund's financial statement story. At $160M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for PDX's accounts payable usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in accounts payable easier to interpret. Start with $160M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.