BackPiedmont Office Realty Trust Overview

Piedmont Office Realty Trust Other Current Liabilities

Track Piedmont Office Realty Trust's other current liabilities ($-190M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$-185.34M

Peer average

Loading

Piedmont Office Realty Trust Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Piedmont Office Realty Trust vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Piedmont Office Realty Trust Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Piedmont Office Realty Trust (PDM) FAQ

Piedmont Office Realty Trust posts a other current liabilities of $-190M as of June 2026. In the prior-year period, the figure was $0. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Piedmont Office Realty Trust's other current liabilities was $0. The latest reading is $-190M (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Piedmont Office Realty Trust's financial statement story. At $-190M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for PDM's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Piedmont Office Realty Trust's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Piedmont Office Realty Trust against Real Estate peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Real Estate are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $-190M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.