BackPrestige Consumer Healthcare Overview

Prestige Consumer Healthcare Total Liabilities

Track Prestige Consumer Healthcare's total liabilities ($2.7B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$2.65B
68.25% YoYΔ $1.08B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Prestige Consumer Healthcare Total Liabilities History

Loading

Prestige Consumer Healthcare vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Prestige Consumer Healthcare Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Prestige Consumer Healthcare (PBH) FAQ

Prestige Consumer Healthcare posts a total liabilities of $2.7B as of June 2026. That compares with $1.6B in the prior-year period — up 68.2% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Prestige Consumer Healthcare's total liabilities was $1.6B. The latest reading is $2.7B — a 68.2% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of Prestige Consumer Healthcare's financial statement story. At $2.7B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for PBH's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Prestige Consumer Healthcare's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Prestige Consumer Healthcare against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $2.7B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.