BackPeople`s United Financial Overview

People`s United Financial Intangible Assets

Track People`s United Financial's intangible assets ($130M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Intangible Assets
$127.80M
22.59% YoYΔ $-37.30M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

People`s United Financial Intangible Assets History

Loading

People`s United Financial vs. peers: Intangible Assets Comparison

Loading

People`s United Financial Intangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

People`s United Financial (PBCT) FAQ

People`s United Financial posts a intangible assets of $130M as of December 2021. That compares with $170M in the prior-year period — down 22.6% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, People`s United Financial's intangible assets was $170M. The latest reading is $130M — a 22.6% year-over-year decrease (period ending December 2021). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Intangible Assets is one piece of People`s United Financial's financial statement story. At $130M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for PBCT's intangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; People`s United Financial's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging People`s United Financial against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in intangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $130M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.