BackParamount Global Overview

Paramount Global Other Current Liabilities

Track Paramount Global's other current liabilities ($7.2B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$7.23B
6.11% YoYΔ $-471.00M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Paramount Global Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Paramount Global vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Paramount Global Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Paramount Global (PARA) FAQ

Paramount Global posts a other current liabilities of $7.2B as of September 2025. That compares with $7.7B in the prior-year period — down 6.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Paramount Global's other current liabilities was $7.7B. The latest reading is $7.2B — a 6.1% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2025). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Paramount Global's financial statement story. At $7.2B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for PARA's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Paramount Global's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Paramount Global against Telecommunications peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Telecommunications are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $7.2B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.