BackBank OZK - 4.625% PRF PERPETUAL USD - Ser A Overview

Bank OZK - 4.625% PRF PERPETUAL USD - Ser A Goodwill

Latest goodwill for OZKAP: $660M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Goodwill
$660.79M
0.00% YoYΔ $0.00 vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Bank OZK - 4.625% PRF PERPETUAL USD - Ser A Goodwill History

Loading

Bank OZK - 4.625% PRF PERPETUAL USD - Ser A vs. peers: Goodwill Comparison

Loading

Bank OZK - 4.625% PRF PERPETUAL USD - Ser A Goodwill Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Bank OZK - 4.625% PRF PERPETUAL USD - Ser A (OZKAP) FAQ

Bank OZK - 4.625% PRF PERPETUAL USD - Ser A posts a goodwill of $660M as of March 2026. That compares with $660M in the prior-year period — up 0.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Bank OZK - 4.625% PRF PERPETUAL USD - Ser A's goodwill was $660M. The latest reading is $660M — essentially flat versus a year earlier (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Goodwill is one piece of Bank OZK - 4.625% PRF PERPETUAL USD - Ser A's financial statement story. At $660M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for OZKAP's goodwill usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Bank OZK - 4.625% PRF PERPETUAL USD - Ser A's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Bank OZK - 4.625% PRF PERPETUAL USD - Ser A against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in goodwill easier to interpret. Start with $660M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.