BackOxford Immunotec Global PLC Overview

Oxford Immunotec Global PLC Net Tangible Assets

Latest net tangible assets for OXFD: $190M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$191.26M
11.03% YoYΔ $-23.71M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Oxford Immunotec Global PLC Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Oxford Immunotec Global PLC vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Oxford Immunotec Global PLC Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Oxford Immunotec Global PLC (OXFD) FAQ

Oxford Immunotec Global PLC posts a net tangible assets of $190M as of September 2020. That compares with $210M in the prior-year period — down 11.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Oxford Immunotec Global PLC's net tangible assets was $210M. The latest reading is $190M — a 11.0% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2020). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Oxford Immunotec Global PLC's financial statement story. At $190M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for OXFD's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Oxford Immunotec Global PLC's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Oxford Immunotec Global PLC against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $190M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.