BackOxbridge Re Holdings Ltd - Warrants (26/03/2029) Overview

Oxbridge Re Holdings Ltd - Warrants (26/03/2029) Long Term Debt

Latest long-term debt for OXBRW: $0.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Long Term Debt
$0.00
100.00% YoYΔ $-214000.00 vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Oxbridge Re Holdings Ltd - Warrants (26/03/2029) Long Term Debt History

Loading

Oxbridge Re Holdings Ltd - Warrants (26/03/2029) vs. peers: Long Term Debt Comparison

Loading

Oxbridge Re Holdings Ltd - Warrants (26/03/2029) Long Term Debt Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Oxbridge Re Holdings Ltd - Warrants (26/03/2029) (OXBRW) FAQ

Oxbridge Re Holdings Ltd - Warrants (26/03/2029) posts a long-term debt of $0 as of June 2026. That compares with $210K in the prior-year period — down 100.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Oxbridge Re Holdings Ltd - Warrants (26/03/2029)'s long-term debt was $210K. The latest reading is $0 — a 100.0% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Long-Term Debt is one piece of Oxbridge Re Holdings Ltd - Warrants (26/03/2029)'s financial statement story. At $0, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for OXBRW's long-term debt usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Oxbridge Re Holdings Ltd - Warrants (26/03/2029)'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Oxbridge Re Holdings Ltd - Warrants (26/03/2029) against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in long-term debt easier to interpret. Start with $0 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.