BackOn Track Innovations Overview

On Track Innovations Other Current Liabilities

On Track Innovations's other current liabilities is $10M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$10.06M
33.03% YoYΔ $2.50M vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

On Track Innovations Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

On Track Innovations vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

On Track Innovations Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

On Track Innovations (OTIVF) FAQ

On Track Innovations posts a other current liabilities of $10M as of March 2022. That compares with $7.6M in the prior-year period — up 33.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, On Track Innovations's other current liabilities was $7.6M. The latest reading is $10M — a 33.0% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2022). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of On Track Innovations's financial statement story. At $10M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for OTIVF's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; On Track Innovations's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging On Track Innovations against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $10M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.