BackOn Deck Capital Overview

On Deck Capital Total Assets

Track On Deck Capital's total assets ($240M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Assets
$241.08M
↓ 80.69% YoYΔ $-1.01B vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

On Deck Capital Total Assets History

Loading

On Deck Capital vs. peers: Total Assets Comparison

Loading

On Deck Capital Total Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Balance Sheet Breakdown

Current CashShort Term InvestmentsReceivablesInventoryOther Current AssetsCurrent AssetsLong Term InvestmentsProperty Plant EquipmentGoodwillIntangible AssetsOther AssetsTotal AssetsNet Tangible AssetsAccounts PayableOther Current LiabilitiesTotal Current LiabilitiesLong Term DebtOther LiabilitiesMinority InterestTotal Liabilities

On Deck Capital (ONDK) FAQ

On Deck Capital posts a total assets of $240M as of June 2020. That compares with $1.2B in the prior-year period — down 80.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, On Deck Capital's total assets was $1.2B. The latest reading is $240M — a 80.7% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2020). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Assets is one piece of On Deck Capital's financial statement story. At $240M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for ONDK's total assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; On Deck Capital's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging On Deck Capital against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in total assets easier to interpret. Start with $240M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.