BackOrbital Infrastructure Group Overview

Orbital Infrastructure Group Total Liabilities

Track Orbital Infrastructure Group's total liabilities ($430M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$427.72M
22.29% YoYΔ $77.95M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Orbital Infrastructure Group Total Liabilities History

Loading

Orbital Infrastructure Group vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Orbital Infrastructure Group Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Orbital Infrastructure Group (OIG) FAQ

Orbital Infrastructure Group posts a total liabilities of $430M as of March 2023. That compares with $350M in the prior-year period — up 22.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Orbital Infrastructure Group's total liabilities was $350M. The latest reading is $430M — a 22.3% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2023). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of Orbital Infrastructure Group's financial statement story. At $430M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for OIG's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Orbital Infrastructure Group's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Orbital Infrastructure Group against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $430M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.