BackNextPlat - Warrants (29/04/2026) Overview

NextPlat - Warrants (29/04/2026) Receivables

Track NextPlat - Warrants (29/04/2026)'s receivables ($8.2M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$8.25M
75.85% YoYΔ $3.56M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

NextPlat - Warrants (29/04/2026) Receivables History

Loading

NextPlat - Warrants (29/04/2026) vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

NextPlat - Warrants (29/04/2026) Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

NextPlat - Warrants (29/04/2026) (NXPLW) FAQ

NextPlat - Warrants (29/04/2026) posts a receivables of $8.2M as of June 2026. That compares with $4.7M in the prior-year period — up 75.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, NextPlat - Warrants (29/04/2026)'s receivables was $4.7M. The latest reading is $8.2M — a 75.8% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of NextPlat - Warrants (29/04/2026)'s financial statement story. At $8.2M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for NXPLW's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; NextPlat - Warrants (29/04/2026)'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging NextPlat - Warrants (29/04/2026) against Energy peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Energy are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $8.2M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.