BackInVivo Therapeutics Holdings Overview

InVivo Therapeutics Holdings Total Liabilities

InVivo Therapeutics Holdings's total liabilities is $670K.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$666000.00
79.56% YoYΔ $-2.59M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

InVivo Therapeutics Holdings Total Liabilities History

Loading

InVivo Therapeutics Holdings vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

InVivo Therapeutics Holdings Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

InVivo Therapeutics Holdings (NVIV) FAQ

InVivo Therapeutics Holdings posts a total liabilities of $670K as of September 2023. That compares with $3.3M in the prior-year period — down 79.6% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, InVivo Therapeutics Holdings's total liabilities was $3.3M. The latest reading is $670K — a 79.6% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2023). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of InVivo Therapeutics Holdings's financial statement story. At $670K, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for NVIV's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; InVivo Therapeutics Holdings's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging InVivo Therapeutics Holdings against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $670K here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.