BackNetwork-1 Technologies Overview

Network-1 Technologies Other Current Liabilities

Latest other current liabilities for NTIP: $66K.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$66000.00
61.85% YoYΔ $-107000.00 vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Network-1 Technologies Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Network-1 Technologies vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Network-1 Technologies Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Network-1 Technologies (NTIP) FAQ

Network-1 Technologies posts a other current liabilities of $66K as of June 2026. That compares with $170K in the prior-year period — down 61.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Network-1 Technologies's other current liabilities was $170K. The latest reading is $66K — a 61.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Network-1 Technologies's financial statement story. At $66K, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for NTIP's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Network-1 Technologies's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Network-1 Technologies against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $66K here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.