BackNomura Research Institute Ltd Unsponsored ADR Overview

Nomura Research Institute Ltd Unsponsored ADR Receivables

Latest receivables for NRILY: $160B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$161.78B
↓ 14.50% YoYΔ $-27.45B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Nomura Research Institute Ltd Unsponsored ADR Receivables History

Loading

Nomura Research Institute Ltd Unsponsored ADR vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Nomura Research Institute Ltd Unsponsored ADR Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Nomura Research Institute Ltd Unsponsored ADR (NRILY) FAQ

Nomura Research Institute Ltd Unsponsored ADR posts a receivables of $160B as of June 2026. That compares with $190B in the prior-year period — down 14.5% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Nomura Research Institute Ltd Unsponsored ADR's receivables was $190B. The latest reading is $160B — a 14.5% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Nomura Research Institute Ltd Unsponsored ADR's financial statement story. At $160B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for NRILY's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Nomura Research Institute Ltd Unsponsored ADR's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Nomura Research Institute Ltd Unsponsored ADR against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $160B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.