BackNio Developments Ltd - Warrants (17/03/2028) Overview

Nio Developments Ltd - Warrants (17/03/2028) Total Assets

Track Nio Developments Ltd - Warrants (17/03/2028)'s total assets ($470M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Assets
$468.97M
2439.11% YoYΔ $450.50M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Nio Developments Ltd - Warrants (17/03/2028) Total Assets History

Loading

Nio Developments Ltd - Warrants (17/03/2028) vs. peers: Total Assets Comparison

Loading

Nio Developments Ltd - Warrants (17/03/2028) Total Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Nio Developments Ltd - Warrants (17/03/2028) (NIOBW) FAQ

Nio Developments Ltd - Warrants (17/03/2028) posts a total assets of $470M as of March 2026. That compares with $18M in the prior-year period — up 2439.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Nio Developments Ltd - Warrants (17/03/2028)'s total assets was $18M. The latest reading is $470M — a 2439.1% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Assets is one piece of Nio Developments Ltd - Warrants (17/03/2028)'s financial statement story. At $470M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for NIOBW's total assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Nio Developments Ltd - Warrants (17/03/2028)'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Nio Developments Ltd - Warrants (17/03/2028) against Materials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Materials are more comparable, which makes gaps in total assets easier to interpret. Start with $470M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.