BackNatural Gas Services Group Overview

Natural Gas Services Group Net Tangible Assets

Natural Gas Services Group's net tangible assets is $290M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$294.49M
10.62% YoYΔ $28.27M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Natural Gas Services Group Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Natural Gas Services Group vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Natural Gas Services Group Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Natural Gas Services Group (NGS) FAQ

Natural Gas Services Group posts a net tangible assets of $290M as of June 2026. That compares with $270M in the prior-year period — up 10.6% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Natural Gas Services Group's net tangible assets was $270M. The latest reading is $290M — a 10.6% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Natural Gas Services Group's financial statement story. At $290M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for NGS's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Natural Gas Services Group's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Natural Gas Services Group against Energy peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Energy are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $290M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.