BackNational Grid Plc Overview

National Grid Plc Other Current Liabilities

Track National Grid Plc's other current liabilities ($740M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$738.04M
72.09% YoYΔ $-1.91B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

National Grid Plc Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

National Grid Plc vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

National Grid Plc Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

National Grid Plc (NGG) FAQ

National Grid Plc posts a other current liabilities of $740M as of March 2026. That compares with $2.6B in the prior-year period — down 72.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, National Grid Plc's other current liabilities was $2.6B. The latest reading is $740M — a 72.1% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of National Grid Plc's financial statement story. At $740M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for NGG's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; National Grid Plc's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging National Grid Plc against Energy peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Energy are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $740M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.