BackNextGen Acquisition - Warrants (06/10/2025) Overview

NextGen Acquisition - Warrants (06/10/2025) Total Current Liabilities

Latest total current liabilities for NGACW: $24M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$23.93M
47.25% YoYΔ $-21.44M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

NextGen Acquisition - Warrants (06/10/2025) Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

NextGen Acquisition - Warrants (06/10/2025) vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

NextGen Acquisition - Warrants (06/10/2025) Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

NextGen Acquisition - Warrants (06/10/2025) (NGACW) FAQ

NextGen Acquisition - Warrants (06/10/2025) posts a total current liabilities of $24M as of March 2026. That compares with $45M in the prior-year period — down 47.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, NextGen Acquisition - Warrants (06/10/2025)'s total current liabilities was $45M. The latest reading is $24M — a 47.3% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of NextGen Acquisition - Warrants (06/10/2025)'s financial statement story. At $24M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for NGACW's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; NextGen Acquisition - Warrants (06/10/2025)'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging NextGen Acquisition - Warrants (06/10/2025) against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $24M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.