BackNewtekOne- 5.50% NT REDEEM 01/02/2026 USD 25 Overview

NewtekOne- 5.50% NT REDEEM 01/02/2026 USD 25 Long Term Debt

Track NewtekOne- 5.50% NT REDEEM 01/02/2026 USD 25's long-term debt ($2.7B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Long Term Debt
$2.71B
55.06% YoYΔ $961.37M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

NewtekOne- 5.50% NT REDEEM 01/02/2026 USD 25 Long Term Debt History

Loading

NewtekOne- 5.50% NT REDEEM 01/02/2026 USD 25 vs. peers: Long Term Debt Comparison

Loading

NewtekOne- 5.50% NT REDEEM 01/02/2026 USD 25 Long Term Debt Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

NewtekOne- 5.50% NT REDEEM 01/02/2026 USD 25 (NEWTZ) FAQ

NewtekOne- 5.50% NT REDEEM 01/02/2026 USD 25 posts a long-term debt of $2.7B as of June 2026. That compares with $1.7B in the prior-year period — up 55.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, NewtekOne- 5.50% NT REDEEM 01/02/2026 USD 25's long-term debt was $1.7B. The latest reading is $2.7B — a 55.1% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Long-Term Debt is one piece of NewtekOne- 5.50% NT REDEEM 01/02/2026 USD 25's financial statement story. At $2.7B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for NEWTZ's long-term debt usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; NewtekOne- 5.50% NT REDEEM 01/02/2026 USD 25's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging NewtekOne- 5.50% NT REDEEM 01/02/2026 USD 25 against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in long-term debt easier to interpret. Start with $2.7B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.