BackNoble Midstream Partners LP - Unit Overview

Noble Midstream Partners LP - Unit Receivables

Noble Midstream Partners LP - Unit's receivables is $110M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$113.96M
43.14% YoYΔ $34.34M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Noble Midstream Partners LP - Unit Receivables History

Loading

Noble Midstream Partners LP - Unit vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Noble Midstream Partners LP - Unit Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Noble Midstream Partners LP - Unit (NBLX) FAQ

Noble Midstream Partners LP - Unit posts a receivables of $110M as of March 2021. That compares with $80M in the prior-year period — up 43.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Noble Midstream Partners LP - Unit's receivables was $80M. The latest reading is $110M — a 43.1% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2021). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Noble Midstream Partners LP - Unit's financial statement story. At $110M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for NBLX's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Noble Midstream Partners LP - Unit's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Noble Midstream Partners LP - Unit against Energy peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Energy are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $110M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.