BackNautilus Biotechnology Overview

Nautilus Biotechnology Net Tangible Assets

Track Nautilus Biotechnology's net tangible assets ($130M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$131.11M
27.60% YoYΔ $-49.98M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Nautilus Biotechnology Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Nautilus Biotechnology vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Nautilus Biotechnology Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Nautilus Biotechnology (NAUT) FAQ

Nautilus Biotechnology posts a net tangible assets of $130M as of June 2026. That compares with $180M in the prior-year period — down 27.6% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Nautilus Biotechnology's net tangible assets was $180M. The latest reading is $130M — a 27.6% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Nautilus Biotechnology's financial statement story. At $130M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for NAUT's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Nautilus Biotechnology's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Nautilus Biotechnology against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $130M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.