BackNaked Brand Group Overview

Naked Brand Group Other Current Liabilities

Track Naked Brand Group's other current liabilities ($20M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$20.27M
15.39% YoYΔ $2.70M vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

Naked Brand Group Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Naked Brand Group vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Naked Brand Group Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Naked Brand Group (NAKD) FAQ

Naked Brand Group posts a other current liabilities of $20M as of March 2026. That compares with $18M in the prior-year period — up 15.4% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Naked Brand Group's other current liabilities was $18M. The latest reading is $20M — a 15.4% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Naked Brand Group's financial statement story. At $20M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for NAKD's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Naked Brand Group's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Naked Brand Group against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $20M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.