BackNational Australia Bank Limited Overview

National Australia Bank Limited Total Liabilities

National Australia Bank Limited's total liabilities is $1.1T.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$1075.67B
4.16% YoYΔ $42.95B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

National Australia Bank Limited Total Liabilities History

Loading

National Australia Bank Limited vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

National Australia Bank Limited Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

National Australia Bank Limited (NABZY) FAQ

National Australia Bank Limited posts a total liabilities of $1.1T as of March 2026. That compares with $1T in the prior-year period — up 4.2% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, National Australia Bank Limited's total liabilities was $1T. The latest reading is $1.1T — a 4.2% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of National Australia Bank Limited's financial statement story. At $1.1T, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for NABZY's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; National Australia Bank Limited's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging National Australia Bank Limited against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $1.1T here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.