BackMaxim Integrated Products Overview

Maxim Integrated Products Total Liabilities

Track Maxim Integrated Products's total liabilities ($2.1B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$2.11B
6.86% YoYΔ $135.31M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Maxim Integrated Products Total Liabilities History

Loading

Maxim Integrated Products vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Maxim Integrated Products Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Maxim Integrated Products (MXIM) FAQ

Maxim Integrated Products posts a total liabilities of $2.1B as of June 2021. That compares with $2B in the prior-year period — up 6.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Maxim Integrated Products's total liabilities was $2B. The latest reading is $2.1B — a 6.9% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2021). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of Maxim Integrated Products's financial statement story. At $2.1B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for MXIM's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Maxim Integrated Products's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Maxim Integrated Products against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $2.1B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.