BackMetalla Royalty and Streaming Overview

Metalla Royalty and Streaming Total Current Liabilities

Latest total current liabilities for MTA: $3.7M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$3.68M
↑ 12.99% YoYΔ $422840.00 vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Metalla Royalty and Streaming Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Metalla Royalty and Streaming vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Metalla Royalty and Streaming Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Metalla Royalty and Streaming (MTA) FAQ

Metalla Royalty and Streaming (MTA) currently reports a total current liabilities of $3.7M as of June 2026. That compares with $3.3M in the prior-year period — up 13.0% year over year. Use the charts on this page to explore Metalla Royalty and Streaming's total current liabilities history and peer comparisons.

Metalla Royalty and Streaming's total current liabilities increased from $3.3M to $3.7M — a 13.0% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Watching multi-year history on the chart below helps separate one-off swings from a lasting trend.

Metalla Royalty and Streaming reported $3.7M in total current liabilities as of June 2026. That compares with $3.3M in the prior-year period — up 13.0% year over year. Absolute dollar amounts are most useful when compared with prior periods, peers, and related line items such as revenue, assets, or liabilities on Stockcircle.

Start with the current total current liabilities of $3.7M, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Metalla Royalty and Streaming, and consider following MTA for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Metalla Royalty and Streaming is classified in the Materials sector. On total current liabilities, it currently shows $3.7M. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Materials are usually more informative than comparing MTA with unrelated industries.