BackMadison Square Garden Sports Overview

Madison Square Garden Sports Other Current Liabilities

Madison Square Garden Sports's other current liabilities is $470M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$470.90M
19.73% YoYΔ $77.59M vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

Madison Square Garden Sports Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Madison Square Garden Sports vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Madison Square Garden Sports Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) FAQ

Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) currently reports a other current liabilities of $470M as of March 2026. That compares with $390M in the prior-year period — up 19.7% year over year. Use the charts on this page to explore Madison Square Garden Sports's other current liabilities history and peer comparisons.

Madison Square Garden Sports's other current liabilities increased from $390M to $470M — a 19.7% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Watching multi-year history on the chart below helps separate one-off swings from a lasting trend.

Madison Square Garden Sports reported $470M in other current liabilities as of March 2026. That compares with $390M in the prior-year period — up 19.7% year over year. Absolute dollar amounts are most useful when compared with prior periods, peers, and related line items such as revenue, assets, or liabilities on Stockcircle.

Start with the current other current liabilities of $470M, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Madison Square Garden Sports, and consider following MSGS for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Madison Square Garden Sports is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. On other current liabilities, it currently shows $470M. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Consumer Discretionary are usually more informative than comparing MSGS with unrelated industries.