BackMSG Networks Overview

MSG Networks Receivables

Track MSG Networks's receivables ($110M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$112.11M
↓ 18.31% YoYΔ $-25.13M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

MSG Networks Receivables History

Loading

MSG Networks vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

MSG Networks Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Balance Sheet Breakdown

Current CashShort Term InvestmentsReceivablesInventoryOther Current AssetsCurrent AssetsLong Term InvestmentsProperty Plant EquipmentGoodwillIntangible AssetsOther AssetsTotal AssetsNet Tangible AssetsAccounts PayableOther Current LiabilitiesTotal Current LiabilitiesLong Term DebtOther LiabilitiesMinority InterestTotal Liabilities

MSG Networks (MSGN) FAQ

MSG Networks posts a receivables of $110M as of March 2021. That compares with $140M in the prior-year period — down 18.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, MSG Networks's receivables was $140M. The latest reading is $110M — a 18.3% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2021). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of MSG Networks's financial statement story. At $110M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for MSGN's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; MSG Networks's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging MSG Networks against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $110M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.