BackEverspin Technologies Overview

Everspin Technologies Other Current Liabilities

Track Everspin Technologies's other current liabilities ($5.6M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$5.59M
15.79% YoYΔ $-1.05M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Everspin Technologies Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Everspin Technologies vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Everspin Technologies Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Everspin Technologies (MRAM) FAQ

Everspin Technologies posts a other current liabilities of $5.6M as of March 2026. That compares with $6.6M in the prior-year period — down 15.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Everspin Technologies's other current liabilities was $6.6M. The latest reading is $5.6M — a 15.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Everspin Technologies's financial statement story. At $5.6M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for MRAM's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Everspin Technologies's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Everspin Technologies against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $5.6M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.