BackMallinckrodt Plc - New Overview

Mallinckrodt Plc - New Other Current Assets

Track Mallinckrodt Plc - New's other current assets ($250M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Assets
$253.40M
44.14% YoYΔ $77.60M vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

Mallinckrodt Plc - New Other Current Assets History

Loading

Mallinckrodt Plc - New vs. peers: Other Current Assets Comparison

Loading

Mallinckrodt Plc - New Other Current Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Mallinckrodt Plc - New (MNK) FAQ

Mallinckrodt Plc - New posts a other current assets of $250M as of March 2026. That compares with $180M in the prior-year period — up 44.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Mallinckrodt Plc - New's other current assets was $180M. The latest reading is $250M — a 44.1% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Assets is one piece of Mallinckrodt Plc - New's financial statement story. At $250M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for MNK's other current assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Mallinckrodt Plc - New's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Mallinckrodt Plc - New against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current assets easier to interpret. Start with $250M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.